秦和生,张志林,谢振奖,黄志琼,何梦秀.果桑新品种引种试验及综合评价[J].中国南方果树,2020,49(2): |
果桑新品种引种试验及综合评价 |
Introduction Experiment and Comprehensive Analysis of New Fruit Mulberry Varieties |
投稿时间:2019-06-28 修订日期:2019-07-11 |
DOI:10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20190362 |
中文关键词: 果桑 试验 评价 |
英文关键词:fruit mulberry experiment evaluation |
基金项目:广西桑蚕技术体系桂林综合试验站,广西桑蚕特色作物试验站,现代特色农业关键技术研究与应用示范 |
|
摘要点击次数: 1891 |
全文下载次数: 2265 |
中文摘要: |
引进9个果桑品种,以目前全国种植面积最大的粤桑大10为对照进行试验,从物候期、农艺性状、产量、抗性等方面进行观察、比较和综合评价,结果表明,粤桑大10、四季果桑、台果72C002适宜在桂林作为特色果桑品种适当发展,金墙63不适宜在桂林发展。 |
英文摘要: |
9 fruit mulberry varieties were introduced, and was carried out the control experiment with the largest planting area in the country of Yuesang Dashi. Observation, comparison and comprehensive evaluation were carried on with phenological period, agronomic traits, yield and resistance. the results showed that Yuesang Dashi, Four seasons fruit mulberry and Taiwan fruit 72C002 are suitable for proper development in Guilin as a characteristic fruit mulberry variety, and Jinqiang 63 is not suitable for development in Guilin. |
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |