新闻动态
热点追踪
  • 主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部
    主办单位:中国农业科学院柑桔研究所
    主  编:陈善春
    地  址:重庆市北碚区歇马街道柑桔研究所内
    邮政编码:400712
    电  话:(023)68349196
    电子邮件:nfgs@cric.cn
    国际标准连续出版物号:1007-1431
    国内统一连续出版物号:50-1112/S
    邮发代号:78-13
    定  价:10.00
  • 你是本站第:1815
  • 今日访问:0
张安世,张中海,高登涛,魏志峰.基于iPBS的巨峰系葡萄品种遗传多样性分析及MCID法快速鉴定[J].中国南方果树,2020,49(4):
基于iPBS的巨峰系葡萄品种遗传多样性分析及MCID法快速鉴定
Genetic%20diversity%20analysis%20and%20rapid%20identification%20by%20MCID%20method%20for%20Kyoho%20grapevine%20series%20germplasm%20based%20on%20iPBS%20markers
投稿时间:2019-10-25  修订日期:2019-12-03
DOI:10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20190606
中文关键词:  葡萄  %20iPBS  %20遗传多样性  人工绘制植物品种鉴别图(MCID)法
英文关键词:Grape  %20iPBS  %20genetic%20diversity  %20manual%20cultivar%20identification%20diagram(MCID)
基金项目:中国农业科学院科技创新工程专项经费项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2015-RIP -04)
作者单位E-mail
张安世* 焦作师范高等专科学校理工学院
中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所 
aszhang1212@163.com 
张中海 焦作师范高等专科学校理工学院 150055454@qq.com 
高登涛 中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所 gaodengtao@caas.cn 
魏志峰 中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所 weizhifeng@caas.cn 
摘要点击次数: 1816
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      为探讨巨峰系葡萄种质的遗传关系,利用iPBS标记对24个巨峰系葡萄品种进行遗传多样性分析,并应用人工绘制品种鉴别示意图法(%20MCID法)建立品种鉴定图(CID)%20。筛选出13个引物对24个巨峰系葡萄品种进行PCR扩增,共扩增出136条带,其中多态性条带99条,多态性比率为72.79%。各引物观测等位基因数(Na)、有效等位基因数(Ne)、Nei’s基因多样性指数(H)和Shannon’s信息指数(I)的平均值分别为1.7206、1.2971、0.1874和0.2972。24个巨峰系葡萄品种的遗传相似系数(GS)在0.6618~0.9485之间,变幅为0.2867。上述结果表明:24个巨峰系葡萄品种间的遗传差异较小。利用UPGMA构建24个巨峰系葡萄种质资源的聚类树状图,在遗传相似系数为0.74处可将24个巨峰系葡萄品种分为2组,其中第Ⅰ组有22个品种,均为欧美杂交种;第Ⅱ组有2个品种,分别为山欧杂种和欧亚种。利用5条引物扩增的多态性谱带构建了24个巨峰系葡萄品种的CID图,利用此CID图可以找出区分任意2个品种的引物,为巨峰系葡萄品鉴定提供科学依据。
英文摘要:
      In%20order to explore%20the%20genetic%20relationship%20among%20the%20germplasm%20resources%20of%20Kyoho%20grapevine%20series%20,%20the%20genetic%20diversity%20of%2024%20cultivars%20was%20analyzed%20by%20iPBS%20marker,%20and%20the%20cultivar%20identification%20diagram%20(CID)was%20constructed%20by%20using%20the%20manual%20cultivar%20identification%20diagram%20(MCID).13%20primers%20were%20screened%20for%20PCR%20amplification%20of%2024%20Cultivars.%20A%20total%20of%20136%20bands%20were%20generated,%20of%20which%2099%20bands%20were%20polymorphic%20bands(72.79%).The%20average%20value%20of%20observed%20number%20of%20alleles(Na),%20effective%20number%20of%20alleles(Ne),%20Nei’s%20gene%20diversity%20(H)%20and%20Shannon’s%20information%20index%20(I)%20were%201.7206,%201.2971,%200.1874%20and%200.2972,%20receptively.The%20genetic%20similarity%20coefficient%20among%2024%20cultivars%20ranged from 0.6618 to 0.9485%20,with%20a%20range%20of%200.2867.%20The%20above%20results%20indicate%20that%20the%20genetic%20differences%20among%20the%20tested%20cultivars%20were%20small.TheSdendrogramSof%2024%20cultivars%20wasSconstructedSusingSUPGMA.They%20can%20be%20divided%20into%202%20groups%20at%20genetic%20similarity%20coefficient%20of%200.74,%20of%20which%20there%20were%2022%20cultivars%20in%20the%20first%20group,%20all%20of%20which%20were%20in%20the%20Euro-American%20hybrids%20species;%20there%20were%202%20cultivars%20in%20the%20Group%20II,%20belonging to V.%20vinifera%20×V.%20amurensis%20and%20the%20V.vinifera%20species.%20The%20cultivar%20identification%20diagram%20(CID)%20of%2024%20cultivars%20was%20constructed%20using%20polymorphic%20bands%20by%205%20primers.%20Using%20the%20CID%20,%20we%20can%20find%20the%20primers%20that%20distinguish%20any%20two%20cultivars,%20providing%20scientific%20basis%20for%20the%20identification%20of%20Kyoho%20grapevine%20series.
查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭