新闻动态
热点追踪
  • 主管单位:中华人民共和国农业农村部
    主办单位:中国农业科学院柑桔研究所
    主  编:周常勇
    地  址:重庆市北碚区歇马街道柑桔研究所内
    邮政编码:400712
    电  话:(023)68349196
    电子邮件:nfgs@cric.cn
    国际标准连续出版物号:1007-1431
    国内统一连续出版物号:50-1112/S
    邮发代号:78-13
    定  价:10.00
  • 你是本站第:2589
  • 今日访问:0
史星雲,王莉,徐珊珊,殷益明.不同葡萄品种果实品质差异性分析与评价[J].中国南方果树,2022,51(4):
不同葡萄品种果实品质差异性分析与评价
Analysis and Evaluation on the Difference of Fruit Quality of Seven Table Grapes
投稿时间:2022-02-10  修订日期:2022-05-12
DOI:10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20220068
中文关键词:  鲜食葡萄  果实品质  主成分分析
英文关键词:table grape  fruit quality  principal component analysis
基金项目:浙江省果品产业技术团队项目(浙江农科发[2020]6号)《‘阳光玫瑰’葡萄生态栽培技术研究》,湖州市公益应用研究项目(2019GZ19),2021年湖州市南太湖特支计划人才项目
作者单位E-mail
史星雲 湖州市农业科技发展中心(湖州市农业科学研究院) shixingyunlove@163.com 
王莉 湖州市农业科技发展中心(湖州市农业科学研究院) 1107479509@qq.com 
徐珊珊 双林镇公共事业服务中心 0603xss@163.com 
殷益明* 湖州市农业科技发展中心(湖州市农业科学研究院) 1050420908@qq.com 
摘要点击次数: 1914
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      为开展鲜食葡萄果实品质评价及优良新品种筛选提供参考依据,以‘巨峰’、‘鄞红’、‘阳光玫瑰’、‘巨玫瑰’、‘蓝宝石’、‘浪漫红颜’和‘新雅’7个葡萄品种为试验材料,测定和分析了葡萄果实的17个品质指标,并运用主成分分析法对7个葡萄品种进行评价。结果表明,不同葡萄品种间果实品质存在一定差异。葡萄果实品质指标间存在不同程度的相关性。通过主成分分析法,共提取了4个主成分,累积方差贡献率高达95.440%,可以反映原指标的大部分信息,7个葡萄果实综合品质排序为鄞红>巨玫瑰>巨峰>浪漫红颜>阳光玫瑰>新雅>蓝宝石,与果实品尝鉴定结果基本一致。该研究摸清了湖州地区几个鲜食葡萄品种果实品质的差异性,发现鄞红和巨玫瑰两个品种在该地区综合品质表现优,这些对指导葡萄产业健康发展有一定的参考价值。
英文摘要:
      To provide a scientific reference for fruit quality evaluation and screen new varieties, seven table grape varieties which consisted of Kyoho, Yinhong, Shine Muscat, Sweet Sapphire, Wagamich, Jumeigui and Xinya were selected to measure or analyze seventeen indices of the fruit quality in this study. At the same time, the extremum normalization method was applied to transform the fruit quality data, and the comprehensive fruit quality of table grapes were evaluated by the principal component analysis. The result showed that there were a difference on fruit quality among seven table grapes. There are different degrees of correlation between the fruit quality indicators of table grapes. Based on the result of principal component analysis, 4 factors were extracted from the converted data matrix with their cumulative contribution reached 95.440%, which could reflect most information of the original indexes. The order of the comprehensive fruit quality of the seven varieties was Yinhong, Jumeigui, Kyoho, Wagamich, Shine Muscat, Xinya and Sweet Sapphire from high to low, which was basically consistent with the result of sensory taste identification. This study finds out the differences of fruit quality among several table grape varieties and the two varieties of Yinhong and Jumeigui with excellent comprehensive quality in Huzhou area. These provides a scientific reference for the healthy development of grape industry.
查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭